Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

[Alan C. <al...@lx...>]

On Mer, 2004-09-29 at 22:52, Felix K=C3=BChling wrote:
> Module                  Size  Used by
> savage                  3520  0
> drm                    62500  3 savage
>=20
> Is it normal that the savage module looks unused?

looks like a bug. If the drm layer provides the file_operations for
the device node then the locking done automatically locks the wrong
module. Thats easy to fix with try_module_get() and module_put()