From: Alex D. <ag...@ya...> - 2004-02-11 22:09:39
|
--- Michel Dänzer <mi...@da...> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 21:26, Alex Deucher wrote: > > I was looking through the the databooks regarding PCI gart and I > > noticed that r128, radeon, and r200 all do PCI gart the same way. > that > > said, I also noticed that PCI GART is limited to 4 MB of system > memory > > when used with a PCI card and 32 MB when used with an AGP card. > > Where did you see that? It's in the r128 DDK software development guide, page 2-23. > > > I haven't yet looked at the gart code in the radeon driver, but > perhaps > > it is trying to use more than 4 MB of system memory > > The default is 8 MB for both AGP and PCI GART. > > > and that is causing the slow down. > > Perhaps, but I'd rather expect different symptoms, and it used to > work > fine for me on older chips. Easy enough to find out though: > > Option "AGPSize" "4" Yeah, it's just a guess. I'm not familiar with the code, nor do I have a PCI card to test with. > > ("GARTSize" is an alias in newer radeon drivers) > > > it may also explain why PCI gart seems to "work" on AGP cards and > older > > radeons, but not on newer PCI ones. > > >From what I remember, mostly AGP cards used to be problematic > traditionally, and only on x86. PCI cards being problematic is a > recent > trend. Yeah. As I recall it seems like mostly r200 PCI cards. Alex > > > -- > Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI > developer > Libre software enthusiast | > http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |