From: Ian R. <id...@us...> - 2003-10-07 17:32:04
|
Michel D=C3=A4nzer wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 13:32, Keith Whitwell wrote: >=20 >>Hmm. These problems only arise because of the way the merge was done? = Why=20 >>not just document the right way to do the merge? >=20 > I think tagging the branch point is a good idea regardless. I agree. Documenting both the right way to do a merge *and* suggesting=20 the extra tag (as a back-up) are good ideas. It would probably be a=20 good idea to also document *why* these steps are desireable. :) |