[Dri-devel] Re: Only "normal" DRI and Mesa CVS access as developer, now?

[Michel <mi...@da...>]

On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 21:53, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:34, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> [SNIP]
> > 
> >>>To XFree86?  Well, that's another question.
> >>
> >>That sounds more negative than I wanted.  Basically, after the drivers are 
> >>living in Mesa cvs, we could well end up just submitting patches to XFree86 
> >>for the rest - but that would be giving up a significant amount of control. 
> >>Probably we'd always want to maintain an xc/ tree somewhere for infrastructure 
> >>work.
> > 
> > 
> > Some of us have write access there already, but I agree that access for
> > all active developers would be very important if not a requirement.
> 
> If you are worried about access issues, why ask dawes for a seperate 
> CVSROOT on xfree86.org which you controlled access to?

Doesn't sound like the worst scenario to me, but I find the benefits of
a shared repository rather tempting.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer   \  Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast  \     http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer