From: Felix <fx...@gm...> - 2003-06-23 11:44:58
|
On 23 Jun 2003 12:17:26 +0200 Michel Dänzer <mi...@da...> wrote: > On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 14:14, Andreas Stenglein wrote: [snip] > > > + /* question: shouldn't the following be controlled by the > > kernelmodule */ > > + /* and/or Xserver-configuration if it can crash the card? */ > > else if (getenv("RADEON_TCL_FORCE_ENABLE")) { > > fprintf(stderr, "Enabling TCL support... this will probably > > crash\n"); > > fprintf(stderr, " your card if it isn't capable of > > TCL!\n"); > > Why? :) > > I do wonder if trying to enable HW TCL makes sense though, there was a > bit of confusion about TCL support on the various chips at the time. > Maybe we can clean this up with the new config infrastructure. I guess the point is that it's dangerous if a DRM client can do something that will lock up the box. On the config-0-0-1-branch there are currently still two TCL-related options for the radeon driver: use_tcl and force_tcl. If you say force_tcl is deprecated we could just drop it. > [snip] Felix ------------ __\|/__ ___ ___ ------------------------- Felix ___\_e -_/___/ __\___/ __\_____ You can do anything, Kühling (_____\Ä/____/ /_____/ /________) just not everything fx...@gm... \___/ \___/ U at the same time. |