From: Alex D. <ale...@gm...> - 2005-01-24 21:25:18
|
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:31:31 +0100, Javier Ruiz Hidalgo <jav...@gm...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to compare my driver performance with you guys. I've got a dell > d600 latitude (with a Radeon Mobility 9000). I've compiled dri from > cvs as described in the dri wiki and everything seems ok (glxinfo > reports " Mesa DRI R200 20041207 AGP 4x x86/MMX/SSE2 TCL"). I'm using > a custom compiled XORG 6.8.1 on debian sid. > > I've measured my driver performance (didn't know a better alternative): > > - 3D (using "glxgears") gives around 1000fps 3D will get a nice speed up from using hyperz (available in mesa/drm cvs) and Roland's tiling patches (see dri-devel ML archives). > - 2D (using "x11perf -shmputxy500") gives around 40/sec the tiling patches may speed up 2d as well. > - composite extension (using "xcompmgr -Cc") really slow (don't know > any program to measure it but moving a translucent window is nearly > impossible :-( > > Is this the expected performance for my card or I can expect to get > higher on 3D/2D? you can get much higher on 3d. see above. > > On the composite extension, who is to blame for the slowness, my > setup, the card driver, the xcommgr manager. are likely to see > improves on this soon? this is a limitation of the current XAA infrastructure. If you want fast composite, you may want to play with Eric Anholt's Xati driver in xserver cvs. Alex > > Thanks !!! > > -- > Javier Ruiz Hidalgo <jav...@gm...> > |