From: Keith W. <ke...@va...> - 2001-03-22 17:55:23
|
Gareth Hughes wrote: > > Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > How certain are you that we won't need any of the POINT_FALLBACK, > > LINE_FALLBACK, etc code again? I've just cut out a bunch of dead stuff in the > > latest driver & can add those little changes & commit, if you like. > > I had just left it in there for now, and was going to do this at some > point as well. I'm still as certain as I can be that we don't have any > rasterization fallbacks, with the caveat that we need to test the > conformance of line and tri AA and so on. I'd be very, very surprised > if the hardware itself was not OpenGL conformant, and so any failures > are likely our fault. > > If you want, rip it out. I like deleting code almost as much as writing > it, and we have it in CVS anyway... Gareth, Have you got some uncommitted code: radeon_ioctl.c: In function `radeonClear': radeon_ioctl.c:636: structure has no member named `hardware' make: *** [radeon_ioctl.o] Error 1 The line is: if ( (mask & DD_STENCIL_BIT) && rmesa->state.stencil.hardware ) { Keith |