From: Anthony D. <or...@no...> - 2003-12-25 07:04:15
|
Vladimir Dergachev wrote: >>Well I figured that if installing the ATI.2 binaries made X work again >>(though without 3D), then why shouldn't running make-install in the ATI.2 >>source tree do the same thing? So I went back to the Xfree86 tree and did >>make-install again, then back to the ATI.2 tree and did the same thing, then >>restarted X. This time, the screen flickered a little and then went black. >> I don't know what it was doing, but it wasn't loading X and Gnome, because >>there was no hard disk activity. But it wouldn't respond to >>Ctrl+Alt+Backspace, nor Ctrl+Alt+F1-F6, nor Ctrl-C. The only thing it >>responded to was Ctrl+Alt+Delete. Then, when it rebooted, I ran startx >>again in a last desperate attempt, and after a longer-than-normal period of >>flickering and blackness, X started!! And now TV works along with hardware >>3D acceleration. So, apparently the ATI.2 binaries don't work, but the CVS >>version does (after some finessing and rebooting). > > > Hmm.. this is very strange. May I ask you to 1) backup your existing X11 > install 2) try to install ati.2 binaries over it again ? So, just backup /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/ and then extract ATI-4.3.0-13.i386.tar.gz to /usr again? > I suspect this might be a directories issues - if you original X install > used different location for X11 drivers. Could be; I'm not sure. The original install was long long ago. > It could also be that, somehow, your system was still loading old drm > module. Is that the radeon.o module that I renamed to gatosdrm.o? The one in the /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/video/ directory? -Anthony http://nodivisions.com/ |