From: Iain T. <Iai...@nt...> - 2001-02-14 22:57:50
|
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Philip Willoughby wrote: > OK, we (myself and the others for whom the radeon driver does not work), > have compared notes and found nothing in common (other than owning radeons) > - could you and anyone else for whom the radeon works well compare your > systems and find out what you have in common? If it is something trivial > like the version of gcc you have, that would be nice to know... OK, gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release). Kernel 2.2.18 with agpgart as a module. AMD Thunderbird/Athlon 100mhz * 10 KT7-RAID board (KT133 chipset) Radeon 64Mb/ViVo (with nothing connected to TV in/out ports) (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon QD (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x5144) (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd0000000 (--) RADEON(0): MMIO registers at 0xdd000000 (--) RADEON(0): VideoRAM: 65536 kByte (64-bit DDR SDRAM) (II) RADEON(0): PLL parameters: rf=2700 rd=60 min=12000 max=35000; xclk=18300 libc-2.1.2 DRI-trunk X code. (installed over a CVS X, taken from a little while after 4.0.2) -- Regards, Iai...@di.... My website: http://www.warwick.ac.uk/~csuli/ XMMS now playing: Command & Conquer - Timebomb |