Re: [Dpcl-develop] Fw: Hybrid v.2

[J. W. <ja...@cs...>]

Dave,

Obviously they do not compare at all.  Its very hard to use the output of
the testcases to determine what is broken, so can you please send me the
daemon log output so that I may try to guess what is going on here?

Let's start with the DPCL/SourceObj subdir.

Also, can you please verify that your build of dyninst is working by
running the test programs in core/dyninstAPI/tests/i386-unknown-linux2.4?

Thanks,

-James

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Dave Wootton wrote:

> James
> I got DPCL to build after installing libelf-0.8.2-4 and libelf-0.8.2-4
> along with an updated libdwarf. I ran the testcases and got the attached
> outlog.txt. I'm not sure what is supposed to work at this time and what
> does not. How does this compare with your runs?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "J. Waskiewicz" <ja...@cs...>
> Sent by: dpc...@ww...
> 07/25/2003 04:00 PM
>
>         To:     Dave Wootton/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
>         cc:     <dpc...@os...>
>         Subject:        Re: [Dpcl-develop] Fw: Hybrid v.2
>
>
> Dave,
>
> I also seem to remember having the "devel" rpm for libelf as important.
>
> rpm -qa | grep libelf
> libelf-0.8.2-2
> libelf-devel-0.8.2-2
>
> -James
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dpcl-develop mailing list
> Dpc...@ww...
> http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/dpcl-develop
>
>