From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-09-21 15:58:31
|
Bugs item #1799742, was opened at 2007-09-21 11:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=422030&aid=1799742&group_id=38414 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Greg Phillips (wgregphillips) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: rst.el performance problems Initial Comment: rst.el revision 5335 has serious performance problems with longer documents under Aquamacs 1.1. Reverting to revision 5039 makes the problem go away, so I suspect it has something to do with the jit-lock/lazy-lock changes introduced in revision 5034 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=422030&aid=1799742&group_id=38414 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-09-23 14:37:18
|
Bugs item #1799742, was opened at 2007-09-21 17:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by smerten You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=422030&aid=1799742&group_id=38414 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Greg Phillips (wgregphillips) >Assigned to: Stefan Merten (smerten) Summary: rst.el performance problems Initial Comment: rst.el revision 5335 has serious performance problems with longer documents under Aquamacs 1.1. Reverting to revision 5039 makes the problem go away, so I suspect it has something to do with the jit-lock/lazy-lock changes introduced in revision 5034 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Stefan Merten (smerten) Date: 2007-09-23 14:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=746432 Originator: NO Another user solved this problem by setting jit-lock-defer-time to 0.25. By default this variable seems to be nil which probably causes the problem. Please try and tell me about your success. Then I'll consider doing a patch - though configuring other modes is probably a bad idea :-/ . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Phillips (wgregphillips) Date: 2007-09-21 18:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1895847 Originator: YES ... oops, I meant "introduced in 5334" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=422030&aid=1799742&group_id=38414 |