go...@us... wrote: > +_`strip_classes` > + List of "classes" attribute values to remove from all elements in > + the document tree. > + > + Default: disabled (None). Option: ``--strip-class``. > + > > +_`strip_elements_with_classes` > + List of "classes" attribute values; matching elements to be > + removed from the document tree. > + > + Default: disabled (None). Option: ``--strip-element-with-class``. I'm sure this can invalidate the doctree. Are we OK with that? I feel kindof uncomfortable... Best, Felix -- Felix Wiemann -- http://www.ososo.de/ |
From: David G. <go...@py...> - 2007-02-12 05:05:07
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
[Felix Wiemann] > go...@us... wrote: >> +_`strip_classes` >> +_`strip_elements_with_classes` >=20 > I'm sure this can invalidate the doctree. Possibly -- I'd like to see some examples though. > Are we OK with that? I feel kindof uncomfortable... Call them power user features, and add some warnings. These features could *possibly* be made safer by limiting their scope (on= ly body elements & sections, for example), but I'd like to leave them general-pur= pose. I have an immediate use: conditional publishing of portions of documents.= I'm working on an S5 presentation where I want speaker notes that are printed= for me (the speaker) but are not included in the handouts. I'm doing this using= ".. class:: speaker-notes". --=20 David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger> |