From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-21 06:34:51
|
Bugs item #1778340, was opened at 2007-08-21 16:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1778340&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XSL Group: output: print/FO/PDF Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Kevin Yank (kyank) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Footnote numbering does not consider ulink footnotes Initial Comment: The fix to bug 1669601 has broken footnote numbering when ulink footnotes are present. This is caused by a simple XPath syntax error on line 93 of fo/footnote.xsl: [ulink.show != 0] should be [$ulink.show != 0] This change corrects the problem completely, while maintaining the fix for bug 1669601. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1778340&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-21 15:26:17
|
Bugs item #1778340, was opened at 2007-08-21 08:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mzjn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1778340&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XSL Group: output: print/FO/PDF >Status: Pending >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Kevin Yank (kyank) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Footnote numbering does not consider ulink footnotes Initial Comment: The fix to bug 1669601 has broken footnote numbering when ulink footnotes are present. This is caused by a simple XPath syntax error on line 93 of fo/footnote.xsl: [ulink.show != 0] should be [$ulink.show != 0] This change corrects the problem completely, while maintaining the fix for bug 1669601. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mauritz Jeanson (mzjn) Date: 2007-08-21 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=582041 Originator: NO A fix for this issue has been added to the current codebase. Please test the fix with the latest snapshot from: http://docbook.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1778340&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-21 17:24:44
|
Bugs item #1778340, was opened at 2007-08-21 08:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mzjn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1778340&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XSL Group: output: print/FO/PDF Status: Pending Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Kevin Yank (kyank) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Footnote numbering does not consider ulink footnotes Initial Comment: The fix to bug 1669601 has broken footnote numbering when ulink footnotes are present. This is caused by a simple XPath syntax error on line 93 of fo/footnote.xsl: [ulink.show != 0] should be [$ulink.show != 0] This change corrects the problem completely, while maintaining the fix for bug 1669601. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mauritz Jeanson (mzjn) Date: 2007-08-21 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=582041 Originator: NO A fix for this issue has been added to the current codebase. Please test the fix with the latest snapshot from: http://docbook.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mauritz Jeanson (mzjn) Date: 2007-08-21 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=582041 Originator: NO A fix for this issue has been added to the current codebase. Please test the fix with the latest snapshot from: http://docbook.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1778340&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-09-05 02:20:20
|
Bugs item #1778340, was opened at 2007-08-20 23:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1778340&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XSL Group: output: print/FO/PDF >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Kevin Yank (kyank) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Footnote numbering does not consider ulink footnotes Initial Comment: The fix to bug 1669601 has broken footnote numbering when ulink footnotes are present. This is caused by a simple XPath syntax error on line 93 of fo/footnote.xsl: [ulink.show != 0] should be [$ulink.show != 0] This change corrects the problem completely, while maintaining the fix for bug 1669601. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2007-09-04 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 Originator: NO This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mauritz Jeanson (mzjn) Date: 2007-08-21 10:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=582041 Originator: NO A fix for this issue has been added to the current codebase. Please test the fix with the latest snapshot from: http://docbook.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mauritz Jeanson (mzjn) Date: 2007-08-21 08:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=582041 Originator: NO A fix for this issue has been added to the current codebase. Please test the fix with the latest snapshot from: http://docbook.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1778340&group_id=21935 |