From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-05-29 20:48:08
|
RFEs item #3530659, was opened at 2012-05-29 13:48 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by wdburns You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=3530659&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: DocBook XML Group: v5.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Bill Burns (wdburns) Assigned to: Norman Walsh (nwalsh) Summary: Schematron constraints for table Initial Comment: Currently, the Schematron rules for DB 5.0 constrain the use of admonitions (caution, note, tip, etc) as descendants of table. Aside from the impracticality of this constraint for technical writers (who frequently use admonitions in tables cells), this rule seems to cause inconsistent validation in some tools (for example, Oxygen 13.2, which sometimes flags the condition and sometimes doesn't). See lines 216-226 in docbook.sch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=3530659&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-05-29 21:12:22
|
RFEs item #3530659, was opened at 2012-05-29 13:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dcramer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=3530659&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: DocBook XML Group: v5.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Bill Burns (wdburns) Assigned to: Norman Walsh (nwalsh) Summary: Schematron constraints for table Initial Comment: Currently, the Schematron rules for DB 5.0 constrain the use of admonitions (caution, note, tip, etc) as descendants of table. Aside from the impracticality of this constraint for technical writers (who frequently use admonitions in tables cells), this rule seems to cause inconsistent validation in some tools (for example, Oxygen 13.2, which sometimes flags the condition and sometimes doesn't). See lines 216-226 in docbook.sch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Cramer (dcramer) Date: 2012-05-29 14:12 Message: +1 I've always wondered why that one is in there (and have removed it from our local oxygen framework). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=3530659&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-14 19:13:12
|
RFEs item #3530659, was opened at 2012-05-29 13:48 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by nwalsh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=3530659&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: DocBook XML Group: v5.0 Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Bill Burns (wdburns) Assigned to: Norman Walsh (nwalsh) Summary: Schematron constraints for table Initial Comment: Currently, the Schematron rules for DB 5.0 constrain the use of admonitions (caution, note, tip, etc) as descendants of table. Aside from the impracticality of this constraint for technical writers (who frequently use admonitions in tables cells), this rule seems to cause inconsistent validation in some tools (for example, Oxygen 13.2, which sometimes flags the condition and sometimes doesn't). See lines 216-226 in docbook.sch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Norman Walsh (nwalsh) Date: 2012-11-14 11:13 Message: Restriction against admonitions in formal objects (tables, figures, examples) removed in 5.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Cramer (dcramer) Date: 2012-05-29 14:12 Message: +1 I've always wondered why that one is in there (and have removed it from our local oxygen framework). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=3530659&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-14 19:20:36
|
RFEs item #3530659, was opened at 2012-05-29 13:48 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by nwalsh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=3530659&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: DocBook XML Group: v5.0 Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Bill Burns (wdburns) Assigned to: Norman Walsh (nwalsh) Summary: Schematron constraints for table Initial Comment: Currently, the Schematron rules for DB 5.0 constrain the use of admonitions (caution, note, tip, etc) as descendants of table. Aside from the impracticality of this constraint for technical writers (who frequently use admonitions in tables cells), this rule seems to cause inconsistent validation in some tools (for example, Oxygen 13.2, which sometimes flags the condition and sometimes doesn't). See lines 216-226 in docbook.sch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Norman Walsh (nwalsh) Date: 2012-11-14 11:13 Message: Restriction against admonitions in formal objects (tables, figures, examples) removed in 5.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Cramer (dcramer) Date: 2012-05-29 14:12 Message: +1 I've always wondered why that one is in there (and have removed it from our local oxygen framework). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384107&aid=3530659&group_id=21935 |