From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2007-08-15 15:04:21
|
At 01:13 15-08-2007, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >Sarcasm aside, I did consider all of that before removing support for >pre-RFC formats. I am quite aware of who is signing with DKIM and with >which versions. Also setting aside the fact that anything "pre-RFC" means >"experimental" and is thus by definition not standard, there was still a >good reason for doing so. Dropping support for pre-RFC formats is a short-term loss but it has a long time gain. Given that dkim-milter also supports DK verification, we can still use that functionality for verifying domains such as gmail.com. We are better off with the code cleanup as it makes dkim-milter easier to maintain. The pre-RFC formats was work in progress. There are issues that were addressed in subsequent (pre-RFC) versions. Regards, -sm |