Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] DKIM 0.2.0 backward compatibility (was: [dkim-milter-discuss] SRS breaking dkim?)

[SM <sm...@re...>]

Hi Murray,
At 11:42 05-12-2005, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>c=simple implies c=simple/simple in the new draft, so there should 
>be some backward compatibility.

I tested a DKIM 0.2.0 signed message against the previous 
version.  The previous version expects "c=simple".  It does not 
process "c=simple/simple" correctly.  If you want to preserve 
backward compatibility, you would have to use "c=simple" for the 
DKIM-Signature.

Regards,
-sm