From: Adrian H. <ha...@re...> - 2006-06-23 23:31:09
|
SM wrote: >At 10:30 20-06-2006, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > >>Actually what's more interesting to me is "miss=r" which means >>reject on missing >>signatures. This should apply to messages bearing no signature if >>the sending >>domain advertises a "we sign all" policy. >> >>If however an unsigned message with no such policy is being >>rejected, that's a bug. >> >> > >Jim, were unsigned messages being rejected? > >REJECTION="bad=r" would reject DK signed messages coming through most >mailing lists as they usually break the DK signatures. > > With the most recent upgrade, I've had the same problem. Yes, unsigned messages are being rejected for me. |