AW: AW: [dict-beta] Newbies question

[Eyermann H. I. B. <hor...@bc...>]

Are you sure?
I read DICTD - which could return other formats - in the post to this
mailinglist there was no hint on kdict at all.

Anyway kdict only displays the data, so it would not matter much which
format is used, does it?

Of course output could be much nicer...

Horst

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:	Christian Gebauer [SMTP:ge...@bi...]
> Gesendet am:	Montag, 26. Februar 2001 11:01
> An:	dic...@di...
> Betreff:	Re: AW: [dict-beta] Newbies question
> 
> Eyermann Horst ICM Bocholt wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > I am not sure how feasable it would be for your project, but depending
> what
> > you do, but if you prepare your own dictionaries,
> > you could prepare dictionaries which do include HTML / TEI
> representations
> > of the word. - A server like this would not conform to the standard, but
> if
> > you only wish to use your client, it might be a way.
> > 
> > If you are interested in bilingual (TEI) dictionaries have a look at my
> site
> > : http://www.freedict.de - the files for dict are in plain text only,
> but
> > the TEI source is available.
> > 
> > If you have any further queries, I am willing to help.
> 
> He originally asked me if I could add support for TEI to Kdict. My
> impression is
> that this wouldn't be very usefull unless the dict standard gets extended,
> so that a client can determine if a definition is in TEI format or plain
> text.
> 
> Greetings
> Christian
> -- 
> >><< Christian Gebauer >><< ge...@bi... >><< ICQ 14916141 >><<