I want to create a struct. After reading the source of the generator, I have to use CORBAStruct. But I don't want to use CORBA, I don't even know where I can find the p_orb.h. Actually, I replaced everywhere "cppname (name)" by "name". What do you think about it ? Does CORBA should still support ? Isn't it a very old feature ???
Thanks for your advice.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Good idea.
I extended the code to handle «struct» or «structure» as an equivalent of CORBAStruct, see commit 8344232. (And similarly for «const» or «constant» as synonym for CORBAConstant, and «typedef» for CORBATypedef.)
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I want to create a struct. After reading the source of the generator, I have to use CORBAStruct. But I don't want to use CORBA, I don't even know where I can find the p_orb.h. Actually, I replaced everywhere "cppname (name)" by "name". What do you think about it ? Does CORBA should still support ? Isn't it a very old feature ???
Thanks for your advice.
Good idea.
I extended the code to handle «struct» or «structure» as an equivalent of CORBAStruct, see commit 8344232. (And similarly for «const» or «constant» as synonym for CORBAConstant, and «typedef» for CORBATypedef.)
Great :-) I didn't thought about that solution but I'm fine with that.