Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] processor type again...

[ed <ed...@it...>]

got it working. guess i just didnt dig deep enough. will post this sort
of stuff there from now on...
thanks,
ed


On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 09:39, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> you should write this kind of questions to our developer mailinglist.
> 
> On 02/02/2003 10:29:14 PM ed wrote:
> >Heiko:
> >maybe you can shed some light on this: i changed uname to output i686
> >instead of i486. However the kernel, upon running make build, is still
> >overwriting .config with a file that sets i486 to the default. also,
> >about half the programs are still compiling for i486. i even tried
> >setting the permission on .config to 444 and it still overwrote it. i
> >also setup a CFLAGS env var with -march=i686. i am missing something
> >here... i'm using the 0.5 source. should i just jump to the cvs, or
> >wait...
> 
> edit the kernel config file build/scripts/config/config_linux and change
> the lines:
> CONFIG_M486=y
> # CONFIG_M686 is not set
> 
> to
> 
> # CONFIG_M486 is not set
> CONFIG_M686=y
> 
> The only package (hope it's the only one) which has a fixed CPU type is
> gmp.
> 
> About the 0.6 sources:
> At some point you have to switch anyway, but I would wait until we have the
> problems with gcc 3.2.1. and glibx 2.3.1 solved.
> And as I mentioned before, in the 0.6 series you can already select the CPU
> type (just Intels, but at least something).
> 
> Regards
>   Heiko
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss