From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2015-11-26 16:04:24
|
Thanks for testing, that's very helpful! > 1) ssh server > I needed to generate this key with ssh-keygen -A Is this something we want to execute automatically if /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ed25519_key is missing? > 5) fdisk > There are 15 of these, I am not used to see that... That's weird. I'm not seeing those on my system. Are there any other error or warning messages in the syslog or during boot? > 6) LVM That's working fine on my servers. Not sure what's going on. Any error or warning messages? > 7) iptables I started looking into this. Frank pointed that one out also. There's something wrong with the module loading and dependency tracking. Not yet sure what's going on. I started a new compile with the 4.2 kernel and the latest kmod. Maybe it's a bug that's fixed now. Heiko Quoting Ma poubelle <the...@gm...>: > Hi, > > First of all, thanks for the great job! > > I did some tests and here my results: > > 1) ssh server > I got in the logs: > Nov 25 12:26:39 Devil sshd[1552]: error: Could not load host key: > /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ed25519_key > > I needed to generate this key with ssh-keygen -A > > 2) radius-client (with PAM) > OK > > 3) apache > Very basic site OK > > 4) mysql > I just logged in and out OK > > 5) fdisk > root@Devil:/etc/init.d# fdisk -l > Disk /dev/ram15: 16 MiB, 16777216 bytes, 32768 sectors > Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes > > There are 15 of these, I am not used to see that... > > 6) LVM > Seems ok, but it is not mounted after a reboot. > I did test with /var/data > > 7) iptables > root@Devil:/etc/init.d# iptables -L > iptables v1.4.21: can't initialize iptables table `filter': Table > does not exist (do you need to insmod?) > Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. > > Do you know what to do? > > 8) heartbeat ? > This package has been removed? > What is the replacement one? > > > > Thanks again! > > Regards. > > > > 2015-11-21 20:53 GMT+01:00 <udo...@al...>: > >> Hi Heiko, >> I don't prefer an symlink, because the output is different - if someone >> use netstat inside an script, the different output will perhaps "kill" >> the script. >> Not the clean way... >> >> What's about an simple message? >> cat /bin/netstat >> #!/bin/bash >> echo "no netstat anymore - please use ss instead" >> >> Udo >> >> Am 2015-11-21 14:20, schrieb Heiko Zuerker: >>> Udo, >>> >>> Should we create a symlink? Not creating one would force us all >>> getting used to the new commands. >>> >>> Heiko >>> >>> Quoting udo...@al...: >>> >>>> Hi Heiko, >>>> instead of netstat "ss" do the job... >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Udo >>>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss -- Regards Heiko Zuerker |