From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2003-11-29 21:42:12
|
> > btw, i'm interested in this patch: > > > > http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/loop-AES.README > > > > it provides a secure loopback system, so you could use the aes modules > from > > kernel to have an encrypted loop device. it is backwards compatible with > > the classic loop command. > >[...] > > > > anyone/someone/everyone against? agree? opinions? > > I would vote against the idea. > > While AES is a very good encryption system, I would have to reasons against > integrating it into DL (for the loopback): > o Extra CPU power would be required to handle the AES decryption - and that > is on top of the CPU power required to handle the decompression that is > already required! Remember - a lot of people run DL on some very old (and > slow) processors. > o Not sure I understand the need. What is it about the ISO image that you > believe requires the encryption? I.e., what are you trying to protect? I don't think you understand. (or maybe I don't understand :) I believe it's for creating encrypted filesystems, on a hard drive. I don't think it has anything to do with the DL ISO image. I also think it's completely optional, so no extra CPU power is required unless you actually setup an encrypted filesystem (in a loopback file). - BS |