From: Nils B. (L. Internet) <ni...@le...> - 2006-01-17 17:44:52
|
Hello, I've used DenyHosts in the past and I'm currently using Fail2Ban [1]. The obvious differences I found is that Fail2Ban blocks hosts using firewall rules, whereas DenyHosts uses /etc/hosts.deny. I know that DenyHosts can be extended to (also) use firewall rules, but I like Fail2Ban because it works like that out of the box. Can anybody point out to me what the other differences between these two scripts are and why you would choose one over the other? Thanks, Nils Breunese. [1] http://fail2ban.sourceforge.net/ |