From: Neil H. <nh...@be...> - 2004-07-01 01:43:20
|
Jason Duell wrote: >>>*) It interferes with that mysterious 'samuel' editor integration. >>> I've never seen 'samuel', but I'm not sure we can just go and >>> deliberately kill that feature. So, a roll-call: anybody using >>> 'samuel', or willing to speak up for it? >>> >>> > >I googled around for it ("samuel editor unix": just "samuel editor" >turns up a lot of people named Samuel who are editors...), and there's >really nothing. The closest I've seen is the 'sam' editor, which was >used in the 1980s by various luminaries at Bell Labs, including Ken >Thompson. The fact that cscope is from the same time period at Bell >Labs makes me suspect that 'samuel' is some 'sam' offshoot. But no one >seems to be using it, so perhaps we ought to nuke the support for it >(it's better to remove it entirely than keep it around in a broken >state, no?). That's my vote. > > > If that is indeed what it is, Then I can get behind that. >-- >Jason Duell Future Technologies Group ><jc...@lb...> Computational Research Division >Tel: +1-510-495-2354 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > > > > > >__________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! >http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. >Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - >digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, >unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com >_______________________________________________ >Cscope-devel mailing list >Csc...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cscope-devel > > > |