From: res <re...@gm...> - 2009-05-14 10:59:40
|
On 14.05.2009 12:43, Pablo Martin wrote: > Is this really needed? It breaks map format compatibility with 1.4. a) 'time' is simply confusing. 'time' in every other use means time _passed_; only in particles it's time _remaining_. Even I already got mislead by the naming and forgot the 'remaining' aspect. b) It doesn't break existing maps. The 'time' attribute is still supported. I also merged the change into 1.4 now. -f.r. |