From: Jeff D. <jef...@sh...> - 2004-10-24 00:58:38
|
Well, I'm down to 1 minute now. I was using 3 minutes. You make a good point about the possibility of not getting a build for a long time when = the quiet period is too long. (We're not a team of so many developers that = a longer quiet period will be a problem, generally speaking.) Conversely, = the down side of a quiet period that is too short is that some files may be missing from a check in when the build is triggered resulting, = presumably, in a failed build. ~Jeff -----Original Message----- From: cru...@li... [mailto:cru...@li...] On Behalf Of = Jeffrey Fredrick Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 3:42 PM To: 'Jeff Davidson'; cru...@li... Subject: RE: [Cruisecontrol-user] QuietPeriod parameter in JMX console ok, how about a bunny? :) What problem do you fear with a quiet period that is too short? What's = the downside of a build that is triggered w/some files not checked in? In my experience a short quiet period is even more desirable w/more developers rather than less desirable, or you might go a very long time w/out a build as the quiet period is triggered again and again by more people checking in. I believe the default quiet period is 1 minute; what are you using? Jtf |