Re: [Crm114-general] Re: OSBF strangeness

[Adam S. <crm...@ad...>]

Fidelis Assis (fi...@po...) wrote:
> I see about the same accuracy with toer.crm as you and that is very good 
> for a single pass over about 5000 messages - 99.6% => 2 errors/500.

Hmm, when you put it like that ... 2 errors ain't bad :-)

> See, you could have had only 2 results better than that: 1 error/500 => 
> 99.8% and 0 error => 100%. I guess that even with a single error one 
> would be disappointed when comparing to 99.984%. And 0 error isn't a 
> real result, of course :).

Good point :-)  OK, I will try multiple shuffles and bigger corpus.