Re: [cricket-users] mtargets and instances

[Bert D. <dri...@pl...>]

On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Scott C. Kennedy wrote:

> Yes, this was/is hard-coded. The webserver was using a relative path for
> the cgi file. But, cricket has been working for all other data, ie.
> single port 
> at a time.. 

Fair enough... Sorry for being on a short leash, but I spend too much
time working through multiple error configurations, and I admit to
stopping reading at the first obvious problem.

I have gone back and read your entire posting :-)

Here's the scoop. Vector instances are ill supported, and as far as I'm
concerned they're candidates to be removed entirely from Cricket, or
rather the compiler should translate them into their own subtree with
the individual ports as targets. What you want to do will not be
achieveable unless someone steps in and codes it up.

I'd suggest to anyone to go to the layout that listInterfaces assumes.

Sorry 'bout that, but I'm not likely to rectify it, because I think
vector instances are a dead end.

Cheers,

				-- Bert
-- 
Bert Driehuis -- dri...@pl... -- +31-20-3116119
If the only tool you've got is an axe, every problem looks like fun!