Re: [Cracklib-devel] packer.h requires previous include again (likestdint.h)

[Neulinger, N. <nn...@um...>]

An unsigned int might be appropriate, but what is wrong with the code
that is already in there?

#if defined(HAVE_INTTYPES_H)
#include <inttypes.h>
#else
#if defined(HAVE_STDINT_H)
#include <stdint.h>
#else
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
typedef unsigned short uint16_t;
#endif
#endif

The only way I could see it being a problem is if:

	packer.h was not included
or
	HAVE_INTTYPES_H or HAVE_STDINT_H was defined and those files
didn't include uint32_t

-- Nathan
=20
------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nn...@um...
University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-6679
UMR Information Technology             Fax: (573) 341-4216
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cra...@li...=20
> [mailto:cra...@li...] On=20
> Behalf Of Mike Frysinger
> Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 1:08 AM
> To: cra...@li...
> Subject: [Cracklib-devel] packer.h requires previous include=20
> again (likestdint.h)
>=20
> looks like with the new prototypes, this broke again ... in=20
> particular, the=20
> export function FindPW() has a type of 'uint32_t'
>=20
> might i suggest changing this to simply an int ?
> -mike
>=20