Re: [maildropl] Re: replacing procmail with maildrop
Brought to you by:
mrsam
From: Robin L. F. <rl...@pa...> - 2004-06-22 04:05:34
|
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Monday 21 June 2004 20:18, David Relson wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 22:00:58 -0400 > > Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Pollywog writes: > > > I would try to determine the owner of the maildrop process, > > > > The owner of the maildrop process is the userid the message is being > > delivered to. > > Hi Sam, > > What you say is consistent with my experiments, including use of strace > to see what's happening. I've tried giving ownership "root:mail" to > /var/log/maildrop.log and making my test user a member of group "mail", > but that doesn't work either. > > Is there any way for maildrop to have a single logfile for all users? > As the sysadmin, that would be very useful for me (as well as the > capability I had with procmail). > If maildrop's processes are owned by the user being delivered to, then it=20 stands to reason that the only way you are going to be able to open a cntra= l=20 og file is if it is world-writeable and that is not an option I'd care to=20 use. I'll settle for putting individual logs in each user's home directory. =2D --=20 Robin Lynn Frank Director of Operations Paradigm-Omega, LLC =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Complaints about my taglines may be directed to f.d...@kg... =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? iD8DBQFA17ACo0pgX8xyW4YRA2HHAKDMZDZmXcHw0ZOtfa61g7LwgD2O5gCeNgN4 n/fpkQ2I1oY9ajxZ3rG+avo=3D =3D0QBz =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |