From: Serdar K. <se...@gr...> - 2015-09-30 09:20:30
|
Hi Remy, Thanks a lot for the answers, all looks good now :) Serdar On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:02 AM, gb <wsn...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > for Q.2 regarding bad FCS, have you set this in wireshark (no matter > security) ? > > > > > 2015-09-29 19:05 GMT+02:00 Serdar Kose <se...@gr...>: > >> Hi, >> >> I have couple questions about sensniff + wireshark. I run sensniff on a >> CC2531 connected to a PC. >> >> Here is the first capture that I ping 6lbr (CC2531) from my PC. >> https://www.cloudshark.org/captures/c72b0c1d2191 >> >> Frame: 1-30, 46-184. 206-215, 245-322 (in total 257 packets) have the >> sequence number 250 and frame pending is false. >> >> Second capture that a node broadcast a packet >> https://www.cloudshark.org/captures/13c991cc88a2 >> frame 1-41 and frame 50- 78 have sequence number 201 and 172 >> respectively. >> >> Q.1) Are they duplicated packets? If it is the case, why do I see >> duplicated packets and is there any way to fix it? >> >> Q.2) All packets are marked as "Bad FCS". (Can the Q1 be related with >> it?) Is it possible to fix it by changing some setting on Wireshark? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Serdar >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Contiki-developers mailing list >> Con...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/contiki-developers >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Contiki-developers mailing list > Con...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/contiki-developers > > |