Re: [Columba-devel] IMAP caching

[Frederik D. <ma...@fr...>]

>
> Actually we have oldest-access-first-out (cruel word combination-sorry).
> Implemented is also not memory but disk caching. So it would also be an
> option to persist the cache for more than one session. But i have not
> implemented a serialization of the cache entries yet. Most likely this
> is also not very awarding either.
>

Arrhh! Sorry, its not an in-memory cache. Its a disk-cache. Then 10MB is
great. Forget all the other blabla. I agree, persisting the cache, doesn't
make much sense currently. It could become interesting if we would start
creating a complete disconnected or offline solution, though. But,
personally, I really hope we'll never do this!

Cheers,
-Frederik