From: Ian B. <ib...@gm...> - 2005-03-19 17:16:15
|
Ok, I've been reading these threads for a while, and I really don't see the difference between the Microsoft Loopback Adapter and the TAP adapter. Both give you direct access between your host system and coLinux, whether or not the external interface is plugged in or not. Why use one over the other? Ian On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:07:51 -0500, Eric S. Johansson <es...@ha...> wrote: > Dave Hylands wrote: > > I got some ideas from this page: > > http://www.sklar.com/blog/archives/55-Wrangling-CoLinux-Networking.html > > > > I installed the Microsoft Loopback adapter, and then setup a "bridged" > > entry (as opposed to using tap) in my config file. I'm using XP, but > > the same thing should work until 2k. > > hmm > > what it looks like I need is a new "interface" on both machines and wire > them together. Now I'm not clear how the loopback interface would play > into that. > > now I can see adding another tap interface for Linux side for this > private network but I'm not sure how to create a virtual equivalent > interface on the Windows side. > > obviously I need to give this a bit more thought. > > -- > http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.03/view.html?pg=5 > > The result of the duopoly that currently defines "competition" is that > prices and service suck. We're the world's leader in Internet > technology - except that we're not. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-devel mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-devel > |