From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-15 18:09:54
|
Bugs item #1636101, was opened at 2007-01-15 18:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=622063&aid=1636101&group_id=98788 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: v0.7.x (release) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Robert de Bath (rdebath) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Slirp still slow Initial Comment: The performance of the slirp interface has improved however it's still very slow compared to the TAP interface. On my machine: TAP32: localhost <-> colinux approx 6..10MBytes/s This is reasonable but not really anywhere near the disk limit, processor usage is high but there appears to be some headroom. SLIRP: To Colinux 3MByte/s, this is OK but isn't limited by anything obvious, neither the CPU nor the disk are maxed out. Slirp, from CoLinux 500Kbyte/s This is so bad that I had to add a TAP interface for X. Everything looks idle; the 100Mbyte file tested was cached in RAM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=622063&aid=1636101&group_id=98788 |