From: *** F. S. Kumar*** <nsa...@gm...> - 2012-07-26 05:03:13
|
John: As you mentioned in your below notes, after instrumentation, I fully searched my C drive, i do not see a cobertura.ser file that is created after code instrumentation is done. Below is the BuildInstument.Xml i used to for code instrumentation. Please take a look and let me know if something is wrong. Also provide me a sample working instrument build file that creates cobertura.ser file. I appreciate your help and time. Thanks in advance Sakthi <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <project name="cobertura.examples.basic" default="InstrumentQReads" basedir="."> <description> Cobertura - http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/ </description> <property file="build.properties" /> <!-- cobertura task definition --> <path id="cobertura.classpath"> <fileset dir="${cobertura.dir}"> <include name="cobertura.jar" /> <include name="lib/**/*.jar" /> </fileset> </path> <taskdef classpathref="cobertura.classpath" resource="tasks.properties"/> <target name="init"> <echo message="MHD: Inside ... init of InstrumentQReads..."/> <mkdir dir="${classes.dir}" /> <mkdir dir="${instrumented.dir}" /> <echo message="MHD: Done... init of InstrumentQReads."/> </target> <target name="compile" depends="init"> <echo message="MHD: Inside ... compile of InstrumentQReads..."/> <javac srcdir="${src.dir}" destdir="${classes.dir}" debug="true" debuglevel="vars,lines,source" > <classpath refid="cobertura.classpath" /> </javac> <echo message="MHD: Done... compile of InstrumentQReads..."/> </target> <target name="instrument" depends="init,compile" > <echo message="MHD: Doing instrumentation for jar files."/> <!-- Remove the coverage data file and any old instrumentation. --> <delete file="cobertura.ser"/> <!-- delete dir="${instrumented.dir}" / --> <!-- Instrument the application jars, writing the instrumented jars, in to ${build.instrumented.dir}. --> <cobertura-instrument datafile="${reports.dir}/basic_coverage.ser" todir="${instrumented.dir}"> <!-- The following line causes instrument to ignore any source line containing a reference to log4j, for the purposes of coverage reporting.--> <ignore regex="org.apache.log4j.*" /> <fileset dir="${jars.dir}"> <include name="**/*.jar" /> </fileset> </cobertura-instrument> <echo message="MHD: done instrumentation of jar Files."/> </target> <target name="test" depends="init,compile"> <junit fork="yes" dir="${basedir}" failureProperty="test.failed"> <!-- Specify the name of the coverage data file to use. The value specified below is the default. --> <sysproperty key="net.sourceforge.cobertura.datafile" file="${basedir}/cobertura.ser" /> <!-- Note the classpath order: instrumented classes are before the original (uninstrumented) classes. This is important. --> <classpath location="${instrumented.dir}" /> <!-- The instrumented classes reference classes used by the Cobertura runtime, so Cobertura and its dependencies must be on your classpath. <classpath refid="cobertura_classpath" /> <formatter type="xml" /> <test name="${testcase}" todir="${reports.xml.dir}" if="testcase" /> <batchtest todir="${reports.xml.dir}" unless="testcase"> <fileset dir="${src.dir}"> <include name="**/*Test.java" /> </fileset> </batchtest> --> </junit> </target> <target name="InstrumentQReads" depends="instrument,compile,test" description="Compile and instrument QReads jar files."/> </project> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:16 AM, John W. Lewis <Joh...@sa...> wrote: > ** ** > > That almost always means that your tests are not using the cobertura.ser > file that is created during the instrumentation. You have to make sure > that the cobertura.ser file is moved to the working directory of your > tests, or use the cobertura property (as described in the Cobertura Ant > documentation) to point to the cobertura.ser file.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Ionel Pagu [mailto:Ion...@te...] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 24, 2012 11:54 AM > *To:* cob...@li... > *Subject:* [Cobertura-devel] coverage not reported properly on the main > page**** > > ** ** > > Hi,**** > > **** > > After tweaking the ant scripts a bit, I was now able to instrument, run > our jUnits and then run the report successfully. However, there is one odd > thing: in the main report page, the coverage is reported as 100% everywhere > but I know our jUnits are not that good. Even further, if I click the links > to check source code I can clearly see code not being (fully) covered. So > now I am puzzled. The tools seems to detect that properly but not summarize > it correctly.**** > > **** > > Any idea?**** > > **** > > Thanks,**** > > *Ionel Pagu***** > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. > It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone > else is unauthorized. **** > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Cobertura-devel mailing list > Cob...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobertura-devel > > -- Thanks and Best Regards Sakthivel Kumar nsa...@gm... |