From: Raymond T. <to...@rt...> - 2001-03-28 20:45:53
|
>>>>> "Raymond" == Raymond Toy <to...@rt...> writes: Raymond> Does anyone really care that some function conses exactly 9945772 Raymond> bytes? Maybe it should be printed as 9712K or even 9.485M? I had a few people mail me privately that that like to that last byte, so I'm not going to change this. Besides, it's a fair amount of work. So, I'll just add the code to line up the columns and the CMUCL specific encapsulation stuff and that should be the end of my changes to metering. I quick question: What about the version string? We shouldn't really keep it as it is: "v2.1 25-JAN-94". Any suggestions? Maybe 2.2-beta or even 3 since it's a part of clocc now. Ray |