From: Marco A. <ma...@cs...> - 2001-05-25 16:37:15
|
> X-Envelope-To: > Cc: mi...@ca..., clo...@li... > Reply-To: sd...@gn... > Mail-Copies-To: never > From: Sam Steingold <sd...@gn...> > User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.104 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Sender: clo...@li... > X-BeenThere: clo...@li... > X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 > Precedence: bulk > List-Help: <mailto:clo...@li...?subject=help> > List-Post: <mailto:clo...@li...> > List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clocc-list>, > <mailto:clo...@li...?subject=subscribe> > List-Id: <clocc-list.lists.sourceforge.net> > List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clocc-list>, > <mailto:clo...@li...?subject=unsubscribe> > List-Archive: <http://lists.sourceforge.net/archives//clocc-list/> > Date: 25 May 2001 09:53:03 -0400 > Content-Length: 1016 > > > * In message <200...@oc...> > > * On the subject of "Re: problem with clocc.lisp" > > * Sent on Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:08 -0400 > > * Honorable Marco Antoniotti <ma...@cs...> writes: > > > > May I advocate a clocc.conf file with contents.... > > > > (conf:defconfiguration "CLOCC" > > (:library-location "/usr/local/src/clocc/" :os-type :unix) > > (:library-location "C:\\gnu\\clocc\\" :os-type :ms-windows)) > > we all would love our packages to be an integral part of the base CLOCC > configuration :-) > > I don't think we should force the users to load a particular package > right away. Well. CL-CONFIGURATION has this pretense :) Anyway, mine was a suggestion. I believe things could really be simplified by it. Cheers -- Marco Antoniotti ======================================================== NYU Courant Bioinformatics Group tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488 719 Broadway 12th Floor fax +1 - 212 - 995 4122 New York, NY 10003, USA http://bioinformatics.cat.nyu.edu "Hello New York! We'll do what we can!" Bill Murray in `Ghostbusters'. |