Re: Problem with CLLIB:INSPECT-CLLIB

[Sam S. <sd...@gn...>]

Paolo,
I am sorry about your troubles, and I thank you for your persistence.

>>>> In message <N0s...@4a...>
>>>> On the subject of "Re: Problem with CLLIB:INSPECT-CLLIB"
>>>> Sent on Tue May 23 06:02:15 EDT 2000
>>>> Honorable Paolo Amoroso <am...@mc...> writes:
 >> On 22 May 2000 11:51:07 -0400, Sam Steingold <sd...@gn...> wrote:
 >> 
 >> > A quick fix would be to edit inspect.lisp and add a numerical argument
 >> > to open-socket-server (say, 12345).
 >> 
 >> I tried this fix, but I bumped into another problem:
 >> 
 >> ;; running ["netscape" "-remote"
 >> "openURL(http://\"127.0.0.1\":12345/0/:s,new-window)"]...netscape-communicator:
 >> not running on display :0.0
 >> done

`browse-url' opens a window in an existing netscape.
if you don't like it, modify cllib:*browsers*.

 >> *** - LISP:SOCKET-WAIT: argument NIL should be a nonnegative fixnum

this is the same kind of bug: NIL was treated differently from missing
arg.  I fixed both this and the previous bug on 2000-05-16, and I see no
easy workaround (you can modify net.lisp, of course...)

 >> I guess I'd better get the latest CLISP development version.

please use CVS.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds)
Micros**t is not the answer.  Micros**t is a question, and the answer is Linux,
(http://www.linux.org) the choice of the GNU (http://www.gnu.org) generation.
There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count and those who cannot.