From: Raymond T. <to...@rt...> - 2002-04-16 20:51:33
|
>>>>> "lin8080" == lin8080 <li...@fr...> writes: lin8080> Peter Wood wrote: lin8080> Is the general consensus that fast, faster, fastest == good, better, lin8080> best? If that is an unconditional judgement, then move to CMUCL. lin8080> ................... lin8080> So, I mean better is: when you can use a command several times and not lin8080> only once. When CPUs move over 1 GHz, what priority has lin8080> speed-optimizing? If there were no reason to go faster, there wouldn't be 2+ GHz processors. There will always be something that needs the speed. Ray |