From: <Joe...@t-...> - 2015-10-22 14:19:37
|
Don, >#-clisp (defun pi() pi) There's a weakness in your proposal, I believe, because IIRC conforming implementations are not allowed to add other definitions to symbols known from the CL package. IOW, a bound (symbol-function 'CL:PI) is not conforming. You'd have to use anoyther symbol, e.g. EXT:PI. I'm surprised that I saw nobody raise that argument. Maybe I'm wrong. Regards, Jörg Höhle |