Re: [clisp-list] question about type specifiers

[Antoniotti M. <ant...@di...>]

There is also CDR 5.

MA



Sent using OWA for iPad
________________________________________
From: Joe...@t-... <Joe...@t-...>
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 6:42:45 PM
To: cli...@li...
Subject: Re: [clisp-list] question about type specifiers

Don Cohen wrote:

>(INTEGER #.MOST-NEGATIVE-FIXNUM (0))
>(INTEGER #.MOST-NEGATIVE-FIXNUM -1)
You could use that one, yes.

>(INTEGER #.(+ MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM 1))
1+, 1-, how ugly. A real mathematician would likely prefer a notation
Involving exclusive upper and lower bounds, and this is exactly what
the extra parentheses introducing singleton lists mean.

See Section 12.1.6. Interval Designators
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/12_af.htm
about Compound Type Specifier Names in 4.2.3
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/04_bc.htm

MOD in CLHS still has the CLtL2 example you mention
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/t_mod.htm

Regards,
        Jörg Höhle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
clisp-list mailing list
cli...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-list