Re: how about to stream-read-sequence, stream-write-sequence?

[Sam S. <sd...@gn...>]

> * Vodonosov Anton <ibqbabfbi@znvy.eh> [2007-03-12 10:17:59 +0300]:
>
> Sam Steingold <sd...@gn...>:
>> we already have stream-read-byte-sequence, stream-read-char-sequence,
>> stream-write-byte-sequence, stream-write-char-sequence.
>> 
>
> I know. Sorry, my previous message is quite long and perhaps you
> haven't read it fully. The problem is that user-defined stream doesn't
> read byte sequence when its element type is character.

if the element type is character, then read-byte-sequence does not make
sense.


-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
http://pmw.org.il http://honestreporting.com http://jihadwatch.org
http://thereligionofpeace.com http://israelunderattack.slide.com
To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions with extra cruft.