Re: AC_FUNC_ALLOCA vs CL_ALLOCA

[Bruno H. <br...@cl...>]

Sam wrote:
> how is AC_FUNC_ALLOCA deficient as compared to CL_ALLOCA?

As of autoconf 2.59, AC_FUNC_ALLOCA is probably as good as our CL_ALLOCA.

> did you submit CL_ALLOCA as a replacement for AC_FUNC_ALLOCA?

I did submit the piece that was missing in earlier versions, yes:

#ifdef _MSC_VER
#include <malloc.h>
#define alloca _alloca

Bruno