From: Bruno H. <br...@cl...> - 2004-09-20 12:01:58
|
Hi, I've revisited the ca. 200 new test failures of the ansi-tests testsuite. For those that now are flagged as "unexpected failures" I have a fix in the queue. For the following, could you, Sam, please take a look? NAMESTRING.3 NAMESTRING.4 PATHNAME-MATCH-P.4 PARSE-NAMESTRING.4 ; only the second value can be fixed DIRECTORY.6 DIRECTORY.7 PPRINT-TABULAR.6 And for the many failing PPRINT-* tests, I think it requires a rewrite of parts of the pretty printer. It's not just an isolated failure. Sam writes in the TODO: > Many pretty-printer test failures. > (Sam - but Bruno has to fix the risky-test in iofkts.tst first) Took a look at it, and found that I understand nothing about it. I think, it will take me 2 or 3 months to work on the pretty-printer. Probably I will start by writing the ANSI CL functionality in Lisp, not C, (without *print-circle* handling), and then move selected parts from Lisp to C. How it will integrate with the existing pretty printer, I have no idea. This is not something I would like to hold up the MOP release for. (The pretty-printer stuff is not a regression, right? It's in the same state as in the 2.33 release?) So my proposal is to schedule this for the 2.35 release, not 2.34. Bruno |