Re: lispbibl.d and side-effect-class declaration issues, module sourc e code incompatibility

[Sam S. <sd...@gn...>]

> * In message <9F8582E37B2EE5498E76392AEDDCD3FE044481D8@G8PQD.blf01.telekom.de>
> * On the subject of "lispbibl.d and side-effect-class declaration issues, module sourc e code incompatibility"
> * Sent on Mon, 12 May 2003 15:03:06 +0200
> * Honorable "Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril" <Joe...@t-...> writes:
>
> o check_value() is not yet documented in lispbibl.d

fixed.

> o Similarly, LISPFUNNR, LISPFUNNF are not.

fixed.

> o The LISPFUN(...,seclass,...) extension has not yet found its way
> into clisp.h,

fixed

> foreign people's modules

huh?!

> or utils/modprep.

fixed.
it appears that nobody uses it anyway (except for the toy
modules/queens)

why is it in C?!  by the time it could be useful,
CLISP has been built already!

> Maybe there's some way to continue to provide the old-style LISPFUN()
> without seclass argument? Like the currently unchanged 
> LISPFUNN() -> LISPFUN(,seclass_default,...).

no.

> It's only paper that becomes old, e.g. my article on modules.

I am still waiting for your texts to become available in a "reasonable
format" (i.e., DocBook/XML or human-readable XHTML).

thanks.

--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat9 GNU/Linux
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.palestine-central.com/links.html>
If Perl is the solution, you're solving the wrong problem. - Erik Naggum