Re: _EMA_? (.d -> .c)

[Bruno H. <ha...@il...>]

Hi Peter,

> Based on my perusal of section 6.10.3 of the c99 spec and some
> Googling of comp.std.c it seems that such a compiler is not a
> compliant c99 compiler.

Agreed. 6.10.3.4: "... the number of arguments (including those
arguments consisting of no preprocessing tokens)..."

That was different in C89 times, see
http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/dr_003.html#Question3

Bruno