From: Edi W. <ed...@ag...> - 2003-01-07 13:54:50
|
"John K. Hinsdale" <hi...@al...> writes: > > Sounds like a worthwhile task although - if I had to choose - I'd > > appreciate if you'd use UFFI... :) > > OK, I'll check that out. I thought UFFI didn't work in CLISP. But > if it does then I'll use it, as I think that is more portable to > other CL implementations, no? No, AFAIK it doesn't work with CLISP (yet) - that's why I put the smiley there. But maybe FastCGI bindings based on UFFI would be another incentive to make CLISP and UFFI work together... :) Cheers, Edi. |