Re: [CIL users] copyFunction and slocals

[Gabriel K. <ga...@ke...>]

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:04:38AM -0700, Benjamin Ylvisaker wrote:
> I was recently looking at copyFunction because I need something similar.
> I was surprised to not find any changes to slocals. Is that a bug or am
> I misunderstanding the role of slocals. 

I'm not sure I understand what you mean (but we have had bugs with
copyFunction in the past, so it may well be another CIL issue). Could
you give an example of the observed behaviour (on a small piece of C
code), and what you would expect instead?

Many thanks,
-- 
Gabriel