Re: [Celestia-developers] Three Barycenter usage problems

[Selden E B. Jr <se...@le...>]

> Selden, Chris:
> > Of course, the necessary orbital information may not be
> > available for most of them. Grant? Fridger?
> I'd guess the data available, reliable and suitable for Celestia will fall
> short of 1000 stars, but maybe not by much.

> >> How about OrbitBarycenter?
> > That sounds fine to me!
> Yes. I think it makes sense to maintain simply "Barycenter" when specifying
> the object. I've not had a problem with "Barycenter" within the definition,
> but I guess it makes sense to have a different name for something doing a
> different job.

Yup.

It's not quite as bad as the confusion between Normal (default) Maps 
and Normal (vector) Maps, but it'd be nice to avoid it from the
beginning.

s.