RE: Re[1]: FW: AW: [CEDET-devel] [ECB-list] Parent classes aren't jump-able

[<kla...@sd...>]

Eric M. Ludlam wrote:
>>>> <kla...@sd...> seems to think that:
>> kla...@sd... wrote:
>   [ ... ]
>>>>   In the above example, you would find that
>>>>=20
>>>> M-x semantic-analyze-current-context
>>>>=20
>>>>   can return some of the right stuff, but only if the point is in
>>>> the body of the method (that you would have to add.)
>>>=20
>>> When i call this command then i always get only the message:
>>> "semantic-up-context: No context of type function to advance in [4
>>> times]"
>=20
> Yes, you have to type in a method with a body, put the cursor in the
> body, and execute the above for it to work.
>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>   The magic function semantic-ctxt-scoped-types also isn't quite
>>>> good enough because it assumes that all namespaces in the local
>>>> file are in scope!=20
>>>>=20
>>>>   I suppose an ideal solution might be to fix the analyze-context
>>>> function (or something like it) to put the active scopes into some
>>>> sort of specialized order, then search them for your symbol.
>>>=20
>>> Why not to enable the magic semantic-ctxt-scoped-types to take into
>>> account Scope, means in the example above, that when called from
>>> within namespace moose It returns only the moose-table and not the
>>> meese-table?!=20
>>>=20
>>> Is this "...it assumes that all namespaces in the local file are in
>>> scope!" a senseful behavior or is assumption a good assumption? -
>>> why it assumes It?
>   [ ... ]
>=20
> That is the default for C/C++.  The default returns nothing at all.
>=20
> I would be happy if anyone who really knows C++ would look at the
> implementation in semantic-c.by

Where you would say we should take a look - this files is quite big? ;-)

>and the method
> semantic-ctxt-scoped-types and make it "right."  I'm not familiar
> enough with C++ to divine the right answer myself.

Hmm, i can make a try..... Do i understand you right, that =
semantic-ctxt-scoped-types
should be the producer of the right types currently in scope?!

Ciao,
Klaus